Interdisciplinary Journal of Civil Engineering

Interdisciplinary Journal of Civil Engineering

Effects of Personality Traits and Demographic Characteristics on Driving Behavior among Public Transport Drivers

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Ka.C., Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
2 Department of Civil Engineering, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Faculty of Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
Abstract
Driving behavior is a major human factor affecting road safety, particularly among professional drivers operating public transport vehicles under demanding traffic and working conditions. This study examines the effects of demographic and personality-related characteristics on driving behavior among public transport drivers. Data were collected through face-to-face questionnaire surveys involving 678 professional drivers, including suburban and urban bus drivers, taxi drivers, and truck and trailer drivers. Six behavioral dimensions were assessed: driving fatigue, risk identification, calmness, patience, driving stress, and thrill seeking. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to identify the underlying behavioral structure,while reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Pearson and Spearman correlation tests were also applied to examine associations between demographic characteristics and behavioral dimensions. The results confirmed the suitability of the data for factor analysis and demonstrated acceptable overall questionnaire reliability. Age, education level,and vehicle ownership were significantly associated with several driving behavior dimensions. Older drivers exhibited differences in fatigue, calmness, patience, and thrill-seeking behaviors, while education level was significantly related to fatigue, calmness, patience, and thrill seeking.These findings highlight the relevance of demographic and personality-related characteristics for understanding behavioral differences among professional drivers and provide implications for driver selection, safety training, fatigue management, and public transport safety policies.
Keywords

Amado, S., Koyuncu, M., & Kacaroglu, G. (2004). Evaluation of factors affecting safe driving: Demographic factors, experience, personality and psycho-technical evaluation. Turk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19(53), 23–34.
Anund, A., Fors, C., Ihlström, J., & Kecklund, G. (2018). An on-road study of sleepiness in split shifts among city bus drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 114, 71–76.
Baghestani, A., Heshami, S., Mahpour, A., Sadeghitabar, S., & Borhani, R. (2025). Behavioral intentions towards ride-hailing services during the pandemic: Using the health belief model and the moderating role of health norms and age. Journal of Transport & Health, 44, 102153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2025.102153
Bergomi, M., Modenese, A., Ferretti, E., Ferrari, A., Licitra, G., Vivoli, R., ... & Aggazzotti, G. (2017). Work-related stress and role of personality in a sample of Italian bus drivers. Work, 57(3), 433–440.
Cicchino, J. B., & McCartt, A. T. (2015). Critical older driver errors in a national sample of serious US crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 80, 211–219.
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Curry, A. E., Pfeiffer, M. R., Durbin, D. R., & Elliott, M. R. (2015). Young driver crash rates by licensing age, driving experience, and license phase. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 80, 243–250.
De Groot, S., Ricote, F. C., & de Winter, J. C. (2012). The effect of tire grip on learning driving skill and driving style: A driving simulator study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(4), 413–426.
Downey, L. A., King, R., Papafotiou, K., Swann, P., Ogden, E., Boorman, M., & Stough, C. (2013). The effects of cannabis and alcohol on simulated driving: Influences of dose and experience. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 50, 879–886.
González-Iglesias, B., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A., & Luengo-Martín, M. Á. (2012). Driving anger and traffic violations: Gender differences. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(4), 404–412.
Hennessy, D. (2011). Social, personality, and affective constructs in driving. In Handbook of traffic psychology (pp. 149–163). Academic Press.
Herrero-Fernández, D. (2011). Psychometric adaptation of the Driving Anger Expression Inventory in a Spanish sample: Differences by age and gender. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(4), 324–329.
Holland, C., & Rathod, V. (2013). Influence of personal mobile phone ringing and usual intention to answer on driver error. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 50, 793–800.
Mahpour, A., Heshami, S., Baghestani, A., & Eftekhari, A. (2026). Road travel satisfaction: Role of quality, experience & intention. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 36, 101826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101826
Mergia, W. Y., Eustace, D., Chimba, D., & Qumsiyeh, M. (2013). Exploring factors contributing to injury severity at freeway merging and diverging locations in Ohio. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 55, 202–210.
Montoro, L., Useche, S., Alonso, F., & Cendales, B. (2018). Work environment, stress, and driving anger: A structural equation model for predicting traffic sanctions of public transport drivers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 497.
Roos, J. M., Sprei, F., & Holmberg, U. (2020). Sociodemography, geography, and personality as determinants of car driving and use of public transportation. Behavioral Sciences, 10(6), 93.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Useche, S. A., Cendales, B., Alonso, F., Montoro, L., & Pastor, J. C. (2019). Trait driving anger and driving styles among Colombian professional drivers. Heliyon, 5(8).
Wang, X., Wang, K., Huang, K., Wu, X., Huang, W., & Yang, L. (2021). The association between demographic characteristics, personality, and mental health of bus drivers in China: A structural equation model. Physiology & Behavior, 229, 113247.
Wu, W. T., Tsai, S. S., Wang, C. C., Lin, Y. J., Wu, T. N., Shih, T. S., & Liou, S. H. (2019). Professional driver’s job stress and 8-year risk of cardiovascular disease: The Taiwan Bus Driver Cohort Study. Epidemiology, 30, S39–S47.
Ye, F., & Lord, D. (2014). Comparing three commonly used crash severity models on sample size requirements: Multinomial logit, ordered probit and mixed logit models. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 1, 72–85.